Dea Moneta
login
Banner Artemide LVI
Outstanding Majorian AE 3
Lot # 442 - Majorian (457-461). AE 13.5 mm. Mediolanum mint (?). Obv. DN IVL MAIORIANVS PER AVG. Pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right. Rev. VICTORI - A AVGGG. Victory standing left, holding wreath and palm branch; in exergue, traces of ethnic MD or DM (?). Cf. RIC X 2645 and 2648; RIC 2642. AE. 1.73 g. 13.50 mm. RR. Very rare and in excellent condition for issue. Lovely deep emerald green patina. Light traces of tooling and smoothing, otherwise good VF. This example seems to confirm that " the reported palm-branch in left reverse field is probably the leading edge of Victory's right wing"(RIC X, p.404, note). The obverse legend ending in PER AVG and the blurred traces of ethnic suggest to attribute this coin to Mediolanum mint, althought with some reservations; indeed the break I - A in the reverse legend is listed only for Ravenna mint. Julius Valerius Majorian owned his name to his maternal grandfather, who had been magister militum in Illyricum in the 370s. He had himself served with distinction under Aetius, and in 455 he was considered a possible successor of Valentinian III. Presumably, when he and Ricimer deposed Avitus in October 456, it was intended that he should succeed him, but according to Sidonius Apollinaris, who knew him personally, he was reluctant to assume the burden, and an interregnum of six months followed during which he and Ricimer were in fact masters of the West but the Emperors were nominally Marcian and, after January 457, Leo. Even after he had been proclaimed emperor by the army outside Rome on 1st April 457, he continued to call himself no more than magister militum, and he was not proclaimed at Ravenna until 28 December 457. Just as Avitus had not been acceptable in Italy, so Majorian was not acceptable in Gaul. In 458 he led an army of German mercenaries into the Rhone valley, made himself master of Lyon, which had accepted a Burgundian garrison, and having defeated the Visigoths outside Arles, he compelled them to come to terms. But his Gallic successes in 458/9 were followed by misfortunes in Spain in 460/1. Two naval expeditions planned against Gaiseric met with disaster, and he was forced to return to Italy with no accomplishment to his credit. Such successes as he had had, however, aroused the suspicions of Ricimer: Majorian, who had deserved better things, was seized by treachery at Tortona on 2 August, deposed, and beheaded five days later. AE4 were struck under Majorian at Milan, Ravenna and Rome […] The coins of all three mints are larger and substantially heavier than any Western bronze coins had been since the reign of Honorius. Lacam (1988, 220) has suggested that these unusually high weights are to be explained by Ricimer's need for better coin to offer Gundobald's mercenaries when preparing for his campaign against the Vandals, but it is difficult to immagine any troops being satisfied with such miserable scraps of metal. (Grierson-Mays 'Catalogue of Late Roman Coin in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and in the Whittemore Collection', Washington, 1992, pp. 250-252).
Lot # 464 - The Gepids. Uncertain king. AR Quarter Siliqua, in the name of Byzantine Emperor Justin I (517-527). Sirmium mint. Obv. C(retrograde) IVS TIIPPIIΛ. Diademed and cuirassed bust right. Rev. Garbled legend. "Theodericus" monogram; cross above, star below. Cf. Demo 123. AR. 0.64 g. 17.00 mm. RRR. Extremely rare and in very good condition for issue. Brilliant and lightly toned. Three almost invisible holes beside edge, otherwise good VF. While coins of this type were first attributed by Brunsmid to the Gepids, Stefan later proposed an Ostrogothic mint at Sirmium has become the most accepted. The incompatibility of the weights of these issues with the Ostrogothic weight standard established under Theoderic, as well as the stylistic and epigraphic similarity with other Gepid issues struck in the names of both Anastasius and Justinian I, led Metlich to conclude that the whole so-called “Sirmium” group is, in fact, Gepid. The Gepids were a sub-tribe of the Goths who began arriving in Dacia in the AD 260s, and spread throughout the Balkans before invading Italy in the wake of collapsing Roman power in the late 5th century AD. For the most part, the Gepids were merely vassals of the greater Ostrogothic or Hunnic tribes, but from AD 454, when they defeated the Huns at Nadeo, to AD 552, when they were displaced by the Lombards, the Gepids possessed a state of their own in the region of the Carpathians and around Sirmium. Very rare silver siliquae and quarter siliquae are attributed to the Gepids during this period.
Outstanding Perctarit Tremissis
Lot # 471 - Lombardic Italy. Perctarit, second reign (672-688 AD). AV Tremissis, struck in the name of an emperor, blundered. Tuscany, uncertain mint. Obv. Blundered legend. Diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right; before, S. Rev. Blundered legend. Cross potent; annular border. BMC Vandals p.134, 22 ff; for letter on obverse, cf. p.135,10 var.(EL, inverted S in obverse right field. AV. 1.25 g. 13.00 mm. RRR. Extremely rare and superb. About EF. Perctarit was king of the Lombards from 661 to 662 the first time and later from 671 to 688. He was the son and successor of Aripert I. He shared power with his brother Godepert. He was a Catholic, whereas Godepert was an Arian. He ruled from Milan, Godepert from Pavia. Godepert called for the aid of Duke Grimoald I of Benevento in a war with Perctarit, but the Beneventan had him assassinated and took control of the kingdom, forcing Perctarit to flee. Perctarit first arrived at the court of the Avar khagan Kakar. Meanwhile, his wife, Rodelinde, and their son Cunincpert were captured by Grimoald and sent to Benevento. In 671, Perctarit returned from exile and reclaimed his realm, which was being ruled on behalf of Grimoald's son Garibald. He made Catholicism the official religion, but did not recognise papal authority. He made peace with the Byzantines and associated Cunincpert with the throne in 678. He sought to put down the rebellion of Alagis, duke of Trent. It was to be his only campaign; he captured the duke, then pardoned and released him. Perctarit was assassinated in 688 by a conspiracy.
Lot # 472 - The Lombards at Pavia. Liutprand (712-744). AV Tremissis. Obv. Legend blurred : DN LIVTPRΛNRX (NRX ligate)(?). Diademed and draped bust right; S/I and dots in right field; on bust, Rx ligate (?). Rev. SCSII HΛHIL. St. Michael, winged, standing left, holding staff ending in trefoil and round shield. Cf. MEC 1, 322 var; Cf. Wroth 2 var. AV. 1.22 g. 21.50 mm. R. Rare and in excellent condition for issue. Good VF/About EF. The Lombards were a Germanic people who were known since the time of Tacitus. By the early sixth century the Lombards had settled in Pannonia, and adopted the Arian religion. In AD 568/9, the Lombards began to invade Italy and quickly took control of the region from the Alps to the Po valley (later known as Lombardy), and established their capital at Pavia in AD 571 under their king, Alboin. Following the death of his successor in AD 574, the dukes could not agree on a new king, resulting in an interregnum of ten years. During this interval, two other independent Lombard duchies were founded in Spoleto and Benevento. With the exception of Liutprand (AD 712-744), the kings of Lombardy were weak and ineffectual, and the kingdom was finally crushed by Charlemagne in AD 774. The Lombards of Benevento thrived under its first dukes, Zotto and Arichis (AD 571-641), and its control expanded to the whole of southern Italy except Apulia and Calabria. Afterward, the hostilities of Lombardy, followed by the Carolingians, Byzantines, Papal States, and finally the Arab invaders, kept Benevento on the defensive, and its power waned. A civil war following the murder of Sicard in AD 839 resulted in the breakup of the greater duchy, and a number of insignificant Lombard dukes intermittently ruled over a greatly reduced Benevento until the mid-eleventh century. Like Benevento, the Lombard duchy of Spoleto was constantly assailed from all sides, and lost its independence after falling to Charlemagne in AD 776. Unlike Lombardy and Benevento, Spoleto has no known coinage. (CNG inv. n. 998953).
Lot # 474 - The Lombards at Pavia. Liutprand (712-744). AV Tremissis. Obv. D[N LI]VTPRΛN. Diademed, draped and cuirassed bust right; M to right; on bust, Rx ligate. Rev. SCSII HΛHIL. St. Michael, winged, standing left, holding staff ending in trefoil and round shield. Cf. MEC 1, -; Bernareggi 82 var. (legends); BMC Vandals 1 var.(same); Arslan 48 var.(same). AV. 1.23 g. 22.00 mm. R. Rare. In excellent condition for issue, broad unclipped flan. About EF. The Lombards were a Germanic people who were known since the time of Tacitus. By the early sixth century the Lombards had settled in Pannonia, and adopted the Arian religion. In AD 568/9, the Lombards began to invade Italy and quickly took control of the region from the Alps to the Po valley (later known as Lombardy), and established their capital at Pavia in AD 571 under their king, Alboin. Following the death of his successor in AD 574, the dukes could not agree on a new king, resulting in an interregnum of ten years. During this interval, two other independent Lombard duchies were founded in Spoleto and Benevento. With the exception of Liutprand (AD 712-744), the kings of Lombardy were weak and ineffectual, and the kingdom was finally crushed by Charlemagne in AD 774. The Lombards of Benevento thrived under its first dukes, Zotto and Arichis (AD 571-641), and its control expanded to the whole of southern Italy except Apulia and Calabria. Afterward, the hostilities of Lombardy, followed by the Carolingians, Byzantines, Papal States, and finally the Arab invaders, kept Benevento on the defensive, and its power waned. A civil war following the murder of Sicard in AD 839 resulted in the breakup of the greater duchy, and a number of insignificant Lombard dukes intermittently ruled over a greatly reduced Benevento until the mid-eleventh century. Like Benevento, the Lombard duchy of Spoleto was constantly assailed from all sides, and lost its independence after falling to Charlemagne in AD 776. Unlike Lombardy and Benevento, Spoleto has no known coinage. (CNG inv. n. 998953).